Sundry Inevitable But Intolerable Conclusions from the Principles of Hermogenes.

Chapter IX.—Sundry Inevitable But Intolerable Conclusions from the Principles of Hermogenes.

He cannot say that it was as its Lord that God employed Matter for His creative works, for He could not have been the Lord of a substance which was co-equal with Himself. Well, but perhaps it was a title derived from the will of another, ⁶²⁰⁸ which he enjoyed—a precarious holding, and not a lordship, ⁶²⁰⁹ and that to such a degree, that ⁶²¹⁰ although Matter was evil, He yet endured to make use of an evil substance, owing, of course, to the restraint of His own limited power, ⁶²¹¹ which made Him impotent to create out of nothing, not in consequence of His power; for if, as God, He had at all possessed power over Matter which He knew to be evil, He would first have converted it into good—as its Lord and the good God—that so He might have a good thing to make use of, instead of a bad one. But being undoubtedly good, only not the Lord withal, He, by using such power ⁶²¹² as He possessed, showed the necessity He was under of yielding to the condition of Matter, which He would have amended if He had been its Lord. Now this is the answer which must be given to Hermogenes when he maintains that it was by virtue of His Lordship that God used Matter—even of His non-possession of any right to it, on the ground, of course, of His not having Himself made it.  Evil then, on your terms, ⁶²¹³ must proceed from God Himself, since He is—I will not say the Author of evil, because He did not form it, but—the permitter thereof, as having dominion over it. ⁶²¹⁴ If indeed Matter shall prove not even to belong to God at all, as being evil, it follows, ⁶²¹⁵ that when He made use of what belonged to another, He used it either on a precarious title ⁶²¹⁶ because He was in need of it, or else by violent possession because He was stronger than it. For by three methods is the property of others obtained,—by right, by permission, by violence; in other words, by lordship, by a title derived from the will of another, ⁶²¹⁷ by force. Now, as lordship is out of the question, Hermogenes must choose which (of the other methods) is suitable to God. Did He, then, make all things out of Matter, by permission, or by force?  But, in truth, would not God have more wisely determined that nothing at all should be created, than that it should be created by the mere sufferance of another, or by violence, and that, too, with ⁶²¹⁸ a substance which was evil?

Footnotes

482:6208

We have rather paraphrased the word “precario”—“obtained by prayer.” [See p. 456.]

482:6209

Domino: opposed to “precario.”

482:6210

Ideo…ut.

482:6211

Mediocritatis.

482:6212

Tali: i.e. potestate.

482:6213

Jam ergo: introducing an argumentum ad hominem against Hermogenes.

482:6214

Quia dominator.

482:6215

Ergo.

482:6216

Aut precario: “as having begged for it.”

482:6217

Precario: See above, note 2, p. 482.

482:6218

De is often in Tertullian the sign of an instrumental noun.